Exhibition of Croatian artists in Vienna

KÜNSTLERHAUS WIEN
“On stage: narrative and performance in contemporary Croatian video
“The Other Reality: Croatian emerging painters

17 NOV  - 4 DEC 2011
opening on Thursday, 17th NOV 2011 at 7pm

Künstlerhaus, Karlsplatz 5, A - 1010 Wien

 

On stage: narrative and performance in contemporary Croatian video

The selection is focused on some of the most recent works of the Croatian artists, members of the Croatian Association of Artists in Zagreb, that have been active, both on national and international level, since 2000. Their latest production, in accordance with personal interests and researches already present in previous works, in different ways refers to the notions of narrative, fiction, storytelling, history and performance in the medium of film and video.

Damir Očko’s  video „The Moon Shall Never Take My Voice: three songs for muted voice and various sounds” stages solo performance of deaf women in three acts: fictional and historical narrative is a starting point for the extraordinary interpretation that translates voice in visual, distorted sign language, and mediates sound through acoustic elements of corporeal expression.

Ana Hušman’s „Football” as a historical starting point has a football match in Mexico City in 1986 and legendary score of Diego Maradona given by his hand. The re-enactment of the play is done though testimonies, followed with an artists attempt to transfer the boys game into sound, i.e. to reinterpret it in a manner of sport radio journalism, uncommonly performed by female voice.

„Staging Actors/Staging Beliefs” by Renata Poljak deals with ideological constructs of past and present, personified in the figure of a movie character, based on a real person, partisan boy Boško Buha, who fought in WW II. The character figured as an imposed role model for children growing up in Yugoslavia after the appearance of the movie in 1979. Twelve years later, the actor for whom it was the only role, faced the real war, where he fought against the Yugoslav army. An interview with him presents 2 opposed ideological constructions and views on war and 20 years of Croatia’s independence.

Dystopian travel in near future is narrated in Lala Raščić’s storytelling video performance „The Damned Dam”. The plot, based on some real events, like the total panic that a radio drama caused in the Bosnian town of Lukavac in 2000, and on its fictional consequences, is told and performed with reminiscence of traditional epic poetry in Bosnia. But forget folklore, since the artists interpretation transforms traditional images and language into fantastic world of „heroes and fairs, love and dystopia, rivers and lakes, damns and factories, BiH and EU” evoked and told in the beautiful scenery of Lukavac, where it all began.

 Jasna Jakšić

The Other Reality: Croatian emerging painters

This generation of Croatian artists gave us a reason to start talking about painting again. They present their thoughts in a playful way, often supported by theoretical backgrounds, and hiding deeper and more complex meaning than it could be grasped at the first sight. While older generations focused their interests mostly on abstraction, both in motives of the paintings and motives for painting, today’s emerging painters play with the figuration and possibilities that allow them to create different worlds. 

The idea of showing the hidden or neglected queer history in order to put the present and the future in the rightful context is the focus of Helena Janecic’s works. In this series she paints women living in the rural conservative surroundings and doing everyday housework while being happily involved in a lesbian relationship. In a witty and engaging manner, Helena speaks about the life in a village and links it with a personal fantasy thus creating the connection between the fictional and the real world.
Dino Zrnec deals with the idea of the past more directly, reminding of the socialist era by posing in front projections showing old socialist factories; he paints the scenes in the airily, almost transparent manner to stress out the absence of one’s personal memory of such places. Nonetheless, his autobiographical approach, both in portraying himself and by sharing his personal memories, is more an adventure than seriously engaged political work.
As well as Dino, Mirna Kutlesa paints with an unusual lightness using a whole spectre of symbols in her paintings. Emphasizing that the world is a wildness which should be discovered and tamed, by putting the people in the wild she discovers her own way to show us the long forgotten but newly rediscovered human freedom.
Both Ivona Juric and Martina Grlic have a quiet introspective approach to painting. While in Ivona’s paintings that insight is amplified with the cycle called “A minute of silence in a day” where she paints trees and plants, the symbols of ever existing life, Martina paints scenes from everyday life happening during the moment of the detonation of an atomic bomb. And just as we are unaware of the quiet life that pulsates in plants, we are unaware of an explosion that sweeps the whole life leaving all in the misty dust.
Sebastijan Dracic thoughtfully uses various elements to create the specific atmosphere of a certain space, would it be interior or exterior, and often plays with the feeling of absence within the painting. This time, Sebastijan presents the old stories and human believes about the end of the world. By painting trees in a forest he actually talks about the life cycle, about the trees that regenerate, lost from sight in the group of many. Both him and Rene Bachrach Kristofic use literature, films, and music to conduct ideas from an abstract thought into a final work. Rene also deals with The End, looking on it from a very personal perspective. Almost sketch alike, he uses the different formats to create the polyptychs, and gives the viewer a choice, almost like a story with multiple endings, to navigate the work in its own way.
At first sight, Pavle Pavlovic uses fun and an easy-going approach to painting, playing with human figures and elements, which tell us some long-forgotten story or set us back to childhood. In spite of it, his painting approach is all but superficial; the concentration and the precision he uses to build those compositions give a touch of the real, making us believe that the story could be personally ours.

Maja Rozman

Exhibition in Kiev / Draw!ing Outline; Contemporary Croatian Draw!ing

HR

First collaboration between Croatian Association of Artists and the National Association of Painters Ukraine will start with the exhibition Draw!ng Outline.

The exhibition will be on view from 5th to 15th May 2011 at the National Association of Painters Ukraine.

Our fist collaboration will start by representing seven young artists from Croatia who in their work reference drawing.

While listening to the sound of scratching we cannot easily identify its source. Likewise, in “The War of the Worlds,” the same sound could represent everything from the static of a radio transmission to the landing of aliens—it becomes audibly embodied in a piece of drawing paper through the act of drawing. Maja Rožman does not reveal the visual result of the recorded action; rather, she inspires the drawing process. In response to this stimulus, we are compelled to present this overview of young Croatian authors who in their work, approach the medium of drawing.

Ines Matijević documents certain details among the ruins of the still unrenovated “Tito’s Castle,” which testifies to collapsed social order and the neglect of heritage. The drawing is predictably marking (instead of substituting) reality by negating the referent. However, in this case we also see a photograph on which the same drawing covers what it represents—it positions itself as a document regardless of the inability to verify.

Culture is built through and based on the concepts of choice and rejection. Anonymity is the majority’s destiny. Dino Zrnec presents the monograph of the art collective “Zemlja” [Land], which in the 1930’s searched for the “Balkan mountain genius” as the last hope for the apathetic European culture. The anonymity sought by the group discloses itself through canonization in historical art narrative. It is identical to the very narrative it absolves by emphasizing ‘some’ and forgetting ‘others’ as is the practice in cases which are not striving to reach such high ideals.

A decoration, amulet or sign of belonging; an awkwardly drawn image of a naked woman on the father’s hand, Božidar Katić appropriates and transposes onto his own body. The sexual motif becomes the center around which a personal history extricates itself, implying questions of memory and tradition rather than sexuality, even though it is placed on the body and represents a body.

Sexuality, which does not aspire to be elaborate, manifests itself in its variations. The gender of the author becomes crucial in understanding and interpretating the work. Helena Janečić, by adopting the language and the codes of comic books, talks about sexuality wherein the gender roles are based upon stereotypes, while the sexual roles are inverted with regard to the dominant culture. Miron Milić by over exaggerating heterosexual fantasies uncovers their counterparts through emancipated female sexuality.

When drawing, Marko Tadić constructs whimsical narratives which are usually presented through the medium of animation, and are dominated by the sound of old radio dramas. By appropriating the sound of famous radio drama, the plot reveals itself through a séance with an intermediary spirit, who unravels the mystery before our eyes with the help of a black Ouija board, a standard requisite of such events.

artOmat program

  • Five more days of artOmat!
  • Trg žrtava fašizma bb
  • 10000 Zagreb
  • 10. - 24.12.
  • work days 2 i 9 pm
  • weekend 12 i 7 pm
  • *Entrance to the fair is free of charge!
  • **Donation to the DJ’s for the Total DJ Night is 10 Kn
  • ***Participation on each workshop is 100 Kn per participant to cover the costs of organization and management of the workshop.

Program Workshops, Events and Music

  • 21.12. Tuesday
  • 14.00 - 19.00 / Collage workshop in all its forms and various possibilities with Josip Ivančić - Pino
  • 15:30 - 17:00From Kitch to Art, AntiMuseum and collaborators - Vladimir Dodig Trokut - lecture
  • 19:45 - 21:00Licitation - expert selection of objects from the collection of the AntiMuseum of Vladimira Dodig Trokuta i collaborators

  • 22.12. Wednesday
  • 17.00 - 20.30 / Beneficiary Art Auction - with Mario Kovač, DJ Mario Kovač & Wine Tasting
  • 17.00 / concert - Borna Šercar
  • 20.30. Krešimir Tadija KapulicaLife is Great

  • 23.12. Thursday
  • 14.00 - 17.00 / Pompons - wool balls workshop in pompom making with Ivana Vulić
  • 18.00 - 24.00 / Total DJ Night - Howconvinient, DJ Ivna, DJ D-gree

  • 24.12. Friday
  • 14. 00 - 19.00 / Closing day - DJ Mario Kovač
  • 17:00 - 18:30Dejan Kljun “Auction” / Barel Gallery

MEDITERRANEAN 2010

 2nd INTERNATIONAL BIENNIAL OF PAINTERS AND SCULPTORS

”MEDITERAN 2010.” SPLIT / ”MEDITERRANEAN 2010” SPLIT

 

THE CULTURAL INSTITUTION GALERIJA KULA

Kralja Tomislava bb, Split

Phone/fax: + 385 (0)21 386 772

gsm: + 385 (0)91 386 7722; + 385 (0) 91 454 6666

e-mail: galerija.kula@gmail.com

www.galerija-kula.hr

 

STATUTE

 

  1. The Cultural Institution Galerija Kula, Kralja Tomislava bb, 21000 Split, OIB: 78686922979, is the Organizer of the 2nd International Biennial of Painters and Sculptors ”Mediteran 2010” / ”Mediterranean 2010” (referred to as Biennial).
  2. The offical languages of the Biennial are English and Croatian.
  3. The theme of the Biennial is ”The Light of Climate”.
  4. The exhibition will run from 23 August 2010 – 13 September 2010. It will be held in the building of the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts (abbrev. HAZU), i.e. the Milesi Palace.
  5. The competition is open to all artists who agree to accept the participation terms and conditions.
  6. Categories of the exhibition are the following:
    1. Painting
    2. Sculpture
  7. The dimensions of paintings must be not less than 70cm, but they should not exceed 120cm.

      The maximum height of sculpture should be 30 cm.

  1. Painting techniques are oil, acrylic and combined techniques on canvas.

Sculpture techniques are plaster, terracotta, bronze or stone.

  1. Works must be duly signed and prepared for the exhibition.
  2. The works which depart from the indicated dimensions or techniques of Article 7 and 8 of this Statute shall be rejected upon their receipt.
  3. Applications for the competition with accompanying documentation will be applied on the application form that can be obtained by the Organizer or via e-mail address: galerija.kula@gmail.com. They can also be taken at the Organizer’s Web site Art Gallery Kula
  4. The Application Form must be readable and properly filled out in block letters and all required data. The information of the Application Form shall be used for the Biennial catalogue. For Application form click here.
  5. The Application Form and a CD with a photograph of the work must be submitted until 1 June 2010 personally, or by postal delivery at the following address:

      Galerija Kula

      Kralja Tomislava bb

            21 000 Split, Croatia,

            or to the stated e-mail address.

  1. The results of the works selected for the participation at the Biennial will be announced on the Web site www.galerija-kula.hr until 1 July 2010.
  2. The works chosen for the participation at the Biennial must be sent at the above stated address of  Galerija Kula until 1 August 2010.
  3. Shipping costs shall be paid by authors.
  4. Upon receiving the artworks, the inspection of their correctness and the minutes concerning their possible damage will be carried out. The Organizer shall not be responsible for a possible damage of the artworks that may occur during their transport.
  5. The communication between authors and the Organizer shall be realized by phone +385 91 386 77 22, +385 91 454 6666 and via e-mail galerija.kula@gmail.com.
  6. Authors can make a donation of their artworks to the Organizer. The donation shall be confirmed on the Application Form. The donated artworks shall be deposited in the Biennial collection and they shall be used for further exhibitions and the presentation of artists.
  7. Authors shall bear the shipping costs for their works and the catalogue delivery.

Once the Biennial exhibition is over, the artworks will be sent back within 3 (three) months.

  1. The artworks will be judged by a Jury consisting of the following members:
    1. Academician Tonko Maroević, Art Historian,
    2. Ivo Babić, Ph.D., Professor of Art History
    3. Radoslav Tomić, Ph.D., Professor of Art History
  2. The decisions made by the Biennial Jury are final.
  3. The Biennial awards are as follows:

1st Place Award in the amount of €1,000

2nd Place Award: Diploma

3rd Place Award: Diploma

  1. Awarded artworks shall be deposited in the Biennial collection and they shall be used for further exhibition and presentation.
  2. The Organizer shall print the catalogue with information on exhibiting artists and  reproduction by every exhibitor.
  3. Every exhibitor receives one free copy of the catalogue with complementary materials.
  4. Upon signing the Application Form the exhibitor acknowledges all stated provisions of the Biennial Statute.
  5. The maximum number of painters and sculptors is 90.

 

Participating artists do not pay a participation fee at the current year’s Biennial.

 

The International Biennial of sculptors and painters Mediteran 2010. / Mediterranean 2010, Split will be realized with the support of the Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Croatia, the City of Split and the Split-Dalmatia County.

 

 

THE BIENNIAL CALENDAR

 

Deadline for the delivery of e-mails, CDs and Application Forms ends on 1 June 2010

Selection of artworks: 1 June – 1 July 2010

Delivery of the selected artworks ends on 1 August 2010

Opening ceremony of the exhibition: 23 August 2010

Deadline for return of artworks ends on 13 December 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

Harpo Foundation: Call for Proposals - Funding Cycle 2010

Call for Proposals
Deadline: April 15, 2010

www.harpofoundation.org

Mission
Harpo Foundation was established in 2006 to support artists who are under recognized by the field. This applies to all artists whether emerging or further along in their careers. We view the definitions of art and artist to be open-ended and expansive.


2010 Funding Focus

The relationship between art and site in an era defined by digital technologies is the focus for Harpo Foundation’s 2010 funding cycle. Of specific interest is the dialectic between the non-locality of the digital world and the existential physicality of our everyday environment. For example, our sense of place is being drastically altered by web space, which brings geographically distant locations together to form a new kind of locality, yet what’s small, local, personal, political and natural informs our vision for a sustainable future; the search for place-bound identity persists.When site-specific art emerged in the late 1960’s, the physical and experiential qualities of a fixed and permanent location inspired the art. Since then, ’site’ has been redefined endlessly, turning the tangible, grounded concept into something fluid and transient. Interestingly, in our everyday lives, the local is often seen as losing ground to globalizing dynamics, evoking the question, has place become an ephemeral, fleeting image?

The Foundation is interested in how artists are reclaiming the significance of the local while simultaneously placing themselves and their creative lives within a global context. We are interested in supporting projects that are grounded in the real world, that will draw upon local phenomena, activate social relationships to inspire a community, trigger memory to recall a place’s unique history, to name just a few of the ways we see artists addressing site today. We are also interested in supporting projects that explore the idea of place using technologies that challenge our traditional notions of what qualifies as locality.

In pursuing this direction for one year, we hope to shed light on how artists today are locating or siting their work in a dematerializing world and the Foundation will prioritize projects that expand, explore, critique, reconcile, and challenge this 21st century phenomenon.


Deadline
The deadline for proposals is April 15, 2010.More information
Visit our website at

 

www.harpofoundation.org for more information about the Foundation’s past grant recipients, proposal guidelines, and process.Julie Deamer, Executive Director
Harpo Foundation
4423-1/2 Mont Eagle Place
Los Angeles, CA 90041
Fax: 00 +(1) 323-254-0532

jdeamer@harpofoundation.org

Camilla Singh in Zagreb

CAMILLA SINGH

Lecture

Tuesday, 15.12.2009., 7pm, Lecture Hall, HDLU

Camilla Singh is an artist and independent curator.  During her presentation she will present images and ideas from four exhibitions she curated at the Museum of Contemporary Canadian Art (MOCCA) in Toronto, Canada between 2005 - 2008, with a specific focus on the communications strategies that were embedded in the exhibition layout and design.

Demons Stole My Soul: rock’n roll drums in contemporary art (2005)           

Eat the Food! (2007)

DAMN YOUR EYES: the infinite dimension of sound (2008)

Dyed Roots: the new emergence of culture (2008)

Lecture by Vittorio Urbani

 

Vittorio Urbani in Zagreb

HDLU

Lecture hall, 14. 10.2009 19,00 h

Vittorio Urbani, born in Ferrara (Italy), 1954. Lives in Venice.

 

Founded in 1993 in Venice “Nuova Icona, Associazione Culturale per le Arti”, a non-profit art organization dedicated to new art production which he since directs. The association has 40 members.

            personally curated or co-curated 180 shows of contemporary visual arts as the director/curator of “Nuova Icona” and also on call by foreign galleries/institutions..

-     edited or co-edited about 80 catalogues and publications for “Nuova Icona”.

-           organized or co-organized:

-           in February 1994, the seminar “Progettare l’Arte Contemporanea” at the Accademia di Belle Arti of Venice;

-           in December 1999 the seminar “La produzione di progetti di arti visive come risorsa economica alternativa alla monocultura turistica di Venezia” (Fondazione Querini Stampalia, Venice).

-           In June 2001 the round table of international curators “Venice Agendas” in collaboration with Winchester School of Art, London (Teatro Consiglio di Quartiere, Giudecca, Venice);

-           in June 2003 “Venice Agendas II” in collaboration with the same institution + Cardiff School of Arts and the British Council (Hotel Metropole, Venice).

-           “Venice Agendas III”, Hotel Metropole, Venezia, June 2003;

-           “Venice Agendas IV: Neighbours in Dialogue”, Hotel Metropole, Venezia, June 2005;

-           organized and curated (with Dora De Diana and Martina Pizzul) in the years 2002 and 2003 the series “Guggenheim Jeune” a string of talks and lectures by artists at the Guggenheim Museum in Venice.

-           participated as invited speaker, at the following meetings on art matters:

-      “Giornata di Studio sull’Archivio Storico delle Arti Contemporanee”, Venice, 

        ASAC, 26/2/94

-      “Arte allo Specchio”, Padoa, 23/10/94              

-      “Emergenti nell’Arte”, Padoa, at the Caffé Pedrocchi, 22/1/95

-      “Arte Nuova a Venezia”, Venice, Scuola dei Calegheri, 25/10/96

-      “Il Restauro del Contemporaneo: i problemi giuridici e il circuito delle informazioni”, Venice, Cà Bembo, 26/10/96

-           “Arte contemporanea e scuola: il senso della comunicazione”, Venezia, Ist. Statale d’Arte, 28-30/11/97;

-           “Art-criticism and Curatorial Practices, East of the EU” care of AICA Turkey, Istanbul,   September 2003

-           “Radar”, conference at Telecom Future Centre,  September 8 / 9, 2004, Venice;

-           Convegno “Spazio, Ambiente, Metamorfosi” organized by the University of Venice and La Sourbonne, Paris, 2 / 3 novembre 2004, Auditorium di Santa Margherita, Venice;

-           “Continental Breakfast- the expanded map”, organized by “Trieste Contemporaneo”, Palazzo Zorzi-UNESCO, Venice, June 8 / 9, 2005

-           visiting curator at Vancouver (B.C., Canada) in September 1999; to Istanbul (Turkey) in October 2000; to Baku (Azerbaijan) in February 2004; to Cardiff (UK) in November 2004; to Rotterdam (Netherlands, Spring 2004).

-           Selector (judge) for the art prize “Perspectives”, Ormeau Baths Gallery, Belfast, September 2004 and called as co-Selector in the Committee of the Kyoto Prize Commission, June 2006.

-           consultancy for the National Pavilion of Turkey (2003) and USA  (2003) in the Biennial of Visual Arts of Venice, plus actively collaborated to the realization and management of the National Pavilions in the Biennale for Ireland (1995, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005); Turkey (2001, 2005), Scotland (2003), Wales (2003, 2005); India (2005); Finland (2005).

-           provided consultancy and collaboration to the National Pavilions of Ireland in Venice Architectural Biennial in 2002 and 2004.

 

  - bibliography (not complete):

 

-     Records of the seminars and meetings (see above);

-     “Forma - nuova scultura italiana”, Venice, Liège, Dublin, Winchester, 1996/97. Text for the catalogue of the show;

-     “Biennale dei Giovani Artisti di Vigonza”, Villa Bettanini, Vigonza,  Italy 1996. Text for the catalogue of the show;

-     “Giuseppe Pulvirenti”, Venice, 1996. Text for the catalogue of the show.

-     “Host: Daniel Harvey and Heather Ackroyd”, Venice, 1996. Text for the catalogue of the show;

-           -     “Robert Morris: Tar Babies of the New World order”, Venice, 1997. Text for the catalogue of the show;

-     “Maurizio Pellegrin: La Stanza Cinese”, Venice, 1997. Text for the     catalogue of the show;

-      “Rosso_Casali”, Venice, 1997. Text for the catalogue of the show;

-     “Transitional - Charles Mason, Stephen Elson, Terry Smith”,    Venice 1998. Text for the catalogue of the show.

-    “Too beautiful to be true: Enzo Apruzzese, Maurizio Pellegrin, Giovanni Rizzoli, Paolo Ravalico Scerri” text for the       catalogue of  the show held in Istanbul in  2000

-     “Starting Over; Maurizio Pellegrin and Charles Mason” Text for the catalogue of the shows held in London 2001 and Venice 2002

-     “Where is my Home? Graham Fagen and Flavio Favelli” Text for the catalogue of the shows held in London 2002, Istanbul 2003 and Venice 2004.

-      “Through the Window: Peter Liversidge and Antonio Riello”, Text for the catalogue of the show held in London 2003

-   “Venice Agendas III”, Conference of International Curators, text in the publication,Hotel Metropole, Venezia, June  2003;

-    “Istantanea di un Duca Morto: solo show by Fabio Mauri”. Text for the Catalogue of the show, held during and under the auspices of the Biennale of Venice 2003.

-    “Continental Breakfast – the expanded map”, essay in the publication by “Trieste Contemporaneo”, publication related to the conference held in Palazzo Zorzi-UNESCO, Venice, June 8 / 9, 2005

-     “Venice Agendas IV – Neighbours in Dialogue”, text in publication, Hotel Metropole, Venice, June 8 / 9, 2005

-      “Space: architecture for art” essay in the book published by Circa Art Magazine, Dublin, 2005

-    “Engaged in Recreation” works by Antonio Riello, Lorraine Burrell and Peter Liversidge, text for the catalogue. Show at Borusan Art Center, Istanbul, November 2005

 

 

www.nuovaicona.org

 

Dario Šolman - The Heart of Perspective, the Making of the Film

DARIO ŠOLMAN

The Heart of Perspective, the Making of the Film

2001-2009 New York

 PM Gallery

 

6.10. - 01. 11.

 

The Heart of Perspective, the Making of the Film

2001-2009 New York

 

The Heart of Perspective, the Making of the Film, is the experimental art project that includes drawings, animation, video, storyboards and written materials. Web site filmlog.org (www.filmolog.org) is integral part of the project, following its development chronologically. All the multimedia components research related visual and narrative themes, and conceptually resemble the early stage of the film production. Diverse elements that make a series of visual/narrative modules will never reach synthesis and become a conventional film. The non-linear and open structure will remain.

Exhibition was made possible by the grants of the Ministry of Culture Republic of Croatia and City of Zagreb, City Office of Culture, Educations and Sport, Jerome Foundation and FaceCroatia. 

 

 

Dario Solman and Conor McGrady: A Conversation

 

 

CM: In your recent work I know that you use perspective in the title, with connotations of how perspective functions in space – how it impacts the dynamics of power, the spatial dimension of experience.

 

DS: In the arts, perspective is a drawing technique used to create an illusion of three-dimensional space on the two-dimensional surface of the paper or canvas. More broadly, perspective describes the way the eye interprets space.

 

I remember art history classes about pre-renaissance art at the Zagreb Art Academy. In the Gothic or early Renaissance painting, before perspective was used, sizes of figures in a painting were established by their significance: Jesus was the biggest, saints were second in size, rich patrons were smaller, and so on according to the hierarchy. This made me wonder: if a person from that era looked at perspective painting, they would wonder why a person appears larger, just because they happen to be closer in space. It’d seem like a trivial reason compared to the totality of the mythology.

 

An interesting thing about the use of perspective is that it always implies a subject; it implies an eye that is looking at the given scene. This is unlike some other modes of presentation such as 2D projection in Egyptian art, or isometric projection in technical drawing. In some of my videos like Worship and Screening, I use the isometric projection. It has an interesting effect - it positions the viewer in an unclear relationship to the observed and gives it a God-like omniscient view.

 

However, when we use perspective in realistic painting, which is based on the mimetic depiction of reality, we want the image to function as a window into another word. Something similar happens in other forms of art like novels and films. Perspective there describes the relationship between the story and storyteller. Their main attraction is that we are transported to another place and that we forget that we are looking at art. The audience is not supposed to be aware of discreet techniques that enable this experience. I use perspective as a sort of metaphor for these discreet techniques.

 

CM: In terms of techniques of engaging the viewer, I’m interested in models of presentation that feature iconic images; in particular as a way of looking at power and how it manifests in individuals and social situations. Some of the recent work directly uses iconic imagery - a businessman on a throne with two lions for example. This is not something drawn from contemporary reality, but is more about desire - the desire for power. Its an idealized depiction of how many businessmen would like to see themselves – on a throne, surrounded by lions.

 

DS: That painting is loaded with mythological meaning.

 

CM: I’m interested in the phenomenon of archetypes, which is a whole other discussion in itself. Five years ago my work was clearly about situations of military occupation and social control, largely drawing on my background in being from in N. Ireland, but these days it’s more ambiguous, tapping into psychological or mythological space. It’s imagined social orders or imagined states of being, either within individuals or within collectives that interest me. For example, there is a policewoman in a painting breastfeeding a baby in a cornfield. There are certain populations who really identify with this form of militant maternalism – that they don’t divorce the role of being a mother with that of being a servant of the state. It’s based on a group of pro war, anti- abortion protestors I once saw at a counter demonstration to an anti-war march. One of them had a placard that read, “Protect Our Unborn Troops”. The idea is that this is not just an embryo - this is the next generation of troops. This is almost thinking on the level of science fiction. Militarized women are breeding the next generation of fighters against an imaged enemy in a war with no end in site. It’s still about an imagined social space – the idea that the nation is an imaged social space and the mythologies that go into constructing it are a mixture of reality and falsehood. The work still comes from real situations of civil unrest - but moves into imagined realms of space or imaged social order. Not just that imagined by right wing lunatics, but also how this idealized sense of being filters into the general populace. In most idealized space there is some element of nature. Utopia, military or otherwise, always has a natural dimension to it.

 

DS: Looking at your work I see condensed moments of narrative that appear as excerpts from a larger whole. For example you have a civilian leading a group of policemen. This mysterious moment inspires the imagination of the viewer to guess and recreate what happened before and after. A whole story is suggested through a single image, an excerpt.

 

Classic European Christian painting tells a story, but not in a continuous linear way. There is a superstructure i.e. the Bible leads you, and between images, you’re given enough space to fill in the blanks and have a creative response. This is unlike the classic 19th century novel or conventional Hollywood film, where you’re constantly told what’s going on, where to go, where to look; you’re led by hand from point A to point B. You’re not allowed, like in an Ozu movie to look sideways, into a scene not strictly connected with the storyline. However, once you’re given some creative space and open multiple levels, than the audience can engage. It’s a form of interactivity - a very popular word in this computer era. But there is interactivity that is much more subtle. For example when you’re reading a book - your imagination is working, creating images and characters.  When audience is creatively invested, the separation between the artist and public starts to blur.

 

I’m not good at story telling and don’t function well in the linear way. My creative process is based around narrative and visual modules that I experiment with and connect in different ways. The Heart of Perspective, Making of the Film project is a result of such process, where all the drawings, animations, videos, storyboards etc. contribute to a larger whole.

 

CM: You mention cinema, and one thing that I think we have in common is definitely an interest in cinema. In terms of my own work the use of the large scale is cinematic. I want a cinematic impact from some of the work –to accentuate the use of iconic imagery.

 

DS: The title of the project refers to filmmaking. But the project will never reach the level of synthesis to become a conventional feature film. I think of it as a pseudo-film – something similar to an early phase of the film production; where we can sense the full potential of film’s multimedia layers, but where the connections are loose and allow for an interactive response.

 

The time component is interesting here. In the so-called time-based arts such as film or music, we are forced to see the work in a linear way. But in the 2D art, we are presented with everything at once. We still need time to observe the work, but we choose in which order to do it. I’d like to preserve this interactive aspect of 2D art in this pseudo-film. That’s why the animations are kept short. When you enter the gallery, your gaze travels around and you can choose to view the work in any order you like.

 

I ‘m curious about your drawings. I notice that you largely work in black and white.

 

CM: To complement the big paintings I was working on a few years ago I started to get more interested in space – in militarized space, or controlled space where people exist in extreme circumstances. Belfast under militarized circumstances produced liminal spaces  - spaces of absence and removal – both physical removal and incarceration and also the absence of aspirations, or the ability to transcend this environment. I wanted the work to relate to this sense of absence, so I stripped out the color to accentuate the white quality of the paper or canvas. My interest in the symbolic aspect of white – with ideas of purity, removal, etc. was key in shaping this body of work. On a purely aesthetic level I also get a lot of satisfaction from stark graphic imagery – black and white. Maybe it’s from growing up with comic books – black and white cinema, black and white photography, printmaking…

 

I produce a lot of drawings in particular, which brings up ideas related to the artist as a producer of images. A friend of mine recently brought up the idea of visual pollution - that at present we are absolutely drowning in a glut of images. This poses a question to us as producers of images. How do we argue the case for our own images – how do we give them weight and gravity, transcend, skirt or cut through the overwhelming volume of images that exist around us?

 

DS: It’s hard to imagine how people 300 years ago perceived paintings. Recently I’ve visited Venice. It was so interesting to see these well-known paintings in their original context. Back then this was the only way you could see a painting:  in a distance, behind altar, as part of the church architecture, only for a brief moment during the mass.

 

CM: Paintings in churches during this time had a tremendous power. They were very important in the manipulation of people’s thoughts and desires. There is the idea that today there are so many images that they have lost their power – but the power of images is paramount. In particular, if you look at how people choose to dress, the way they look, images are still key in creating and shaping desires. For those who argue that images have no power the situation of war is another example. Images of war are ubiquitous, but there are certain images of war that will never be shown in newspapers or on TV. In the media, images of death and mutilation are simply not shown. So images do retain this immense power. Political cartoons, pornography – images of the human body are still taboo and there are complex sets of taboos in place about presenting visual information.

 

DS: Because we are exposed to so many images, the direction of our gaze is not just defined by images themselves, but also in the way they relate to each other in the giant superstructure of mythology. This has a huge effect on the images we create ourselves. As a landscape painter responds to the landscape - we respond to the cultural landscape we’re living in. We don’t react to one image, but to a complicated sea of images and information. So we produce some kind of multidimensional mythological structures.

 

CM: The multi-dimensional power of images is important. I’ve always been drawn to artists who were visionaries, who really open up this power. For example in Cinema you have Kurosawa, Tarkovsky, filmmakers who create these incredibly rich visual tapestries.

 

DS: While the visual artists are pushed to the side to became critical and detached commentators, the cinema takes the center stage in contemporary culture. For example Kurosawa - he wasn’t just making critique of the post-war Japan in the 50s and 60s, he created his own rich mythologies.

 

CM: Kurosawa and Tarkovsky transcended the narrow agenda of the time and place in which they were working with the scope of their vision. You could argue that today the meta-narrative of the artist as visionary doesn’t exist any more – and there are plenty of artists who are not interested in this idea. Filmmakers like these two embraced broad overarching frameworks and big themes - from spirituality, to crisis, to the human condition  - epic human themes.

 

DS: I liked the way you used the word visionary. It’s a good word to describe a myth architect.

 

CM: Visionary can also apply to the details – the way Tarkovsky weaves in natural elements – the wind blowing grass and trees, or Kuroswa’s cloud scenes. That while they are not essential to driving the narrative, they broaden the scope of the vision of the film, adding to a richness of visual information. These days I don’t feel qualified to answer who would characterize as a visionary artist – Bela Tarr maybe.

 

DS: To go back to your work, do you think the mythologies it embodies change depending on the context it’s viewed in? For example, exhibiting in Croatia.

 

CM: It’s interesting to exhibit in Croatia in terms of some of the ideas we’ve been discussing. Also in terms of the shifts from communism to capitalism, or a one party state to a democracy. I’m from a supposedly democratic state (N. Ireland) and live in one (United States) yet there is a fine line between the supposedly democratic state and the police state. In particular in the UK, which is supposed to be a democracy, yet ran a police state in its own back yard (N. Ireland) openly and plain for all to see. The United States has many of the attributes of the police state. The US is also interesting in that its flexibility allows all resistance and protest to operate within the framework of democracy, and become subsumed into the broader fabric of the system. Your protest is democratically allowed – its part of the system – and is subsumed within the fabric of the system and therefore neutralized. You can register your opposition to the war, as it’s your right – but it doesn’t seriously threaten the system and the war goes on. So it’s a fluid system in that it contains and embraces its opposition – but neutralizes them.

 

DS: It’s interesting the way propaganda machine is always associated with communist states. The common perception here is that the U.S. is free of ideology and that everything is in some natural state of being. Actually post WW2 communist propaganda as manifested in posters, paintings, and big monuments etc. is quite naive. Those were all anachronistic art forms - more a symbol than really being able to manipulate the masses. Around the same time, in the West you have a very sophisticated propaganda of the Edward Bernays caliber. He was someone who was approaching and funding researchers to create scientific consensus to stimulate a social environment where certain commercial products would be needed. And if Bernays was working to produce these effects on us 100 years ago, you can only imagine the level of manipulation we’re exposed to nowadays.

 

It would be interesting to trace when art became politically engaged and adopted an anti-establishment stand.

 

CM: A lot of people trace it to Goya. Even though you have figures that were considered rebellious within the Renaissance – Caravaggio for example. The socially conscious artist has been around for the past 200 years, but has always been a minority figure, and yet has always had to rely on having their work made visible by the classes that they often criticize  - as the bourgeoisie have been the backbone of support for all artists.

 

It poses the question of the purpose of the work – what you want to have it achieve, what is the social function, the social value of art? This is a question that I’ve often grappled with. There is the idea that art cannot challenge the system, as contemporary art is a part of the system, and a product of it. In terms of commercial galleries art is viewed as luxury consumer goods. There are many models that resist this of course.  Challenging a social system through mainstream art venues neutralizes the power of the work as these venues represent the system being challenged in many cases. The truly radical artwork usually isn’t welcome in galleries and museums. I do still feel an affinity to Herbert Marcuse’s idea that while art cannot change the world; it can contribute to the thoughts and feelings of those who can.

 

DS: When I entered the graduate school in Ohio, I was very excited about the new cultural environment. The American art scene, especially in the Midwest is very different from Europe - you can do whatever you like and pursue your individual goals, free from institutions, trends, cliques, and other forms of cultural homogenization. But after spending two years there, I felt the lack of these despised institutions. Because in many ways, they represented society. And I need society. To me, art is not supposed to be an individualist pursuit that you do just to satisfy yourself, to “work on yourself”, to “realize yourself.” I feel that art is an essential part of the social fabric, and that what I do has to contribute to the whole.

 

CM. I agree, and feel that artist should be a public intellectual, and not a ruthless individualist – that in producing work in the public realm that the work should contribute to the broader culture. These days the role of the artist is multifarious, but one of the ideas about being an artist that I respond to, is that the work should pose questions or engage an audience. By that I don’t mean that artists should make work about certain topical issues, but I respond to a consciousness of the fact that this is social practice, for all its individualism – that there is a social dimension to being an artist.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibition - “Political Speech is Suprematism: The Meštrović Pavilion” in USA

“Political Speech is Suprematism: The Meštrović Pavilion”

 

Reception: Saturday, September 19, 2009 ; 6:30pm-8:30pm


Slought Foundation Exhibition | September 19 - November 14, 2009


Curated by Branko Franceschi



Slought Foundation is pleased to announce “Political Speech is Suprematism,” an architectural exhibition about the changing history of the Meštrović pavilion in Zagreb, Croatia, and the cultural practices that it has inspired. The exhibition will be on display in the Slought Foundation galleries from September 19 through November 14, 2009. Branko Franceschi, Director of the Croatian Association of Visual Artists (HDLU) and curator of the exhibition, will deliver a lecture on the featured artists and architects on Saturday, September 19th at 6:30pm in conjunction with the exhibition opening. Franceschi will be joined in Philadelphia by featured artists Zoran Pavelic and Josip Zanki, due to the generous support of The Trust for Mutual Understanding.

Designed in 1934 by the late sculptor Ivan Meštrović, the Meštrović pavilion in downtown Zagreb is famous for its singular grandeur and its glass dome. Since its construction, it has become a sort of palimpsest for political agendas, many of them totalitarian. The pavilion was first transformed from an exhibition hall into a mosque, and then into a museum of the revolution. Most recently, after the war of the 1990s had ended, the Meštrović pavilion was turned back into an exhibition hall and placed in the care of the Croatian Association of Visual Artists, its original owners. Since then it has become one of the prestigious contemporary exhibition spaces in Croatia, known for the site specific art works inspired by the architecture’s unique form. The title of the exhibition is taken from one of these practices, a public space intervention by the visual artist Zoran Pavelić (1999).Through its many transformations, the architecture of the pavilion has come to register the complex political aspirations that have swept the region throughout the twentieth century. This political tumult has been reflected and materialized in the very syntax of the pavilion’s architecture, but also the many artworks presented in the pavilion in recent years that have sought to explore its complicated history. In presenting a survey of these artworks at Slought Foundation, the exhibition highlights the pavilion’s symbolic power and explores how a physical structure can captivate the imagination. The result is a unique blend of forms, a trespassing of the usual boundaries between architecture and the visual arts.
Works featured in the exhibition include:

* Near Island: Score for a Complex Scene (2006), by Ben Cain, Tina Gverović, and Susan Kelly
* Untitled (Behind the Curtain) (2000) and The Mosque (2001), both by Igor Grubić
* Political Speech is Suprematism (1999/2000), Home of the Artists (2003), and Voice of the Artist (2003/2005), by Zoran Pavelić
* K2 (1997, and 2009 performance reenactment), by Zlatko Kopljar
* Sculpture (1954-2000), by Ivan Kožarić
* Meštrović Pavilion (2009), an animation by Dario Bardić
* Pavilion & Square / Politics & Power (2009), a documentary by Željko Senečić
 

 

 

 

This program is made possible in part through the generous sponsorship or support of the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, The Trust for Mutual Understanding, and the Society of Friends of the Slought Foundation.

 

http://www.slought.org.

FIRST INTERNATIONAL FINE ARTS SYMPOSIUM 2009

SOUTH BRIDGE OF ORFŰ

FIRST INTERNATIONAL FINE ARTS SYMPOSIUM 2009.

12-19 SEPTEMBER 2009

 

A fine arts symposium is held adjusted to the goals of the Pécs 2010 European Capital of Culture Programme 

 

 

 

Dear Partners,

The House of Civil Communities of Pécs organizes a gathering of painters from the partner cities in 2009 as a part of the preparatory years of the Pécs2010 European Capital of Cultures programme.

As one of the aims of the program is to build strong relations among artists over the border, we would like to invite one painter from each of our partner cities just as Zagreb.

Attached you can find the summary of the project.

If an artist accept our invitation from your city, we are responsible for full-board and all the necessary working material. On the other hand, the artist will be required to cover the travelling costs and to leave one work for the organizers.

Out of these works an exhibition will be held in the House of Civil Communities from 19 September 2009.

A variety of programs will be organized during their stay so that they get better acquainted to the city of Pécs and our culture.

The registration form should be sent to Mrs. Csilla Vincze, the Managing Director of the house of Civil Communities of Pécs,  at csilla.vincze@civilhaz-pecs.hu.

Hope to welcome see a representative of your city in Orfű!

Best regards,

Neumayer Petra Ildikó
nemzetközi kapcsolatok projektmenedzser/international relations project manager 



Pécs2010 Nonprofit Kft.
7621 Pécs, Mária u. 9.
Tel./Phone: +36-30-816-1421; +36-72-514-804


neumayer@pecs2010.hu
 www.pecs2010.hu